<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: If-Then</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.speakstrong.com/newsletter/2006/11/10/if-then/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.speakstrong.com/newsletter/2006/11/10/if-then/</link>
	<description>By Meryl Runion and SpeakStrong, Inc.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 11:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sharon Campell</title>
		<link>http://www.speakstrong.com/newsletter/2006/11/10/if-then/comment-page-1/#comment-791</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharon Campell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 21:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.speakstrong.com/newsletter/2006/11/10/if-then/#comment-791</guid>
		<description>It was a fine editorial decision. Nothing wrong with it; don't be so quick to second guess yourself when you made a decision on a sound basis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was a fine editorial decision. Nothing wrong with it; don&#8217;t be so quick to second guess yourself when you made a decision on a sound basis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: merylrunion</title>
		<link>http://www.speakstrong.com/newsletter/2006/11/10/if-then/comment-page-1/#comment-734</link>
		<dc:creator>merylrunion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 21:17:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.speakstrong.com/newsletter/2006/11/10/if-then/#comment-734</guid>
		<description>I agree they didn't word it well. (Actually, so did they.) I mentioned that their words violated the PowerPhrase test, and when I wrote I wondered if I should detail that more, but if I provide too much detail that is not in line with my main point, the post gets too long. It's an editorial decision I made - perhaps not a good one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree they didn&#8217;t word it well. (Actually, so did they.) I mentioned that their words violated the PowerPhrase test, and when I wrote I wondered if I should detail that more, but if I provide too much detail that is not in line with my main point, the post gets too long. It&#8217;s an editorial decision I made - perhaps not a good one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sharon Campbell</title>
		<link>http://www.speakstrong.com/newsletter/2006/11/10/if-then/comment-page-1/#comment-731</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharon Campbell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 18:24:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.speakstrong.com/newsletter/2006/11/10/if-then/#comment-731</guid>
		<description>Your point about not being mean when you say it is what the Dixie Chicks violated. I am not condoning the extremity of the backlash, but to some extent they paid for possibly being the straw that broke the back of many of us who are disgusted with the mean-spirited, hate-filled, and completely unwarranted attacks on our sitting president from all sorts of sources.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your point about not being mean when you say it is what the Dixie Chicks violated. I am not condoning the extremity of the backlash, but to some extent they paid for possibly being the straw that broke the back of many of us who are disgusted with the mean-spirited, hate-filled, and completely unwarranted attacks on our sitting president from all sorts of sources.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
