<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Phrases for a Conversation About Conversations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.speakstrong.com/newsletter/2007/05/31/phrases-for-a-conversation-about-conversations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.speakstrong.com/newsletter/2007/05/31/phrases-for-a-conversation-about-conversations/</link>
	<description>By Meryl Runion and SpeakStrong, Inc.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: merylrunion</title>
		<link>http://www.speakstrong.com/newsletter/2007/05/31/phrases-for-a-conversation-about-conversations/#comment-1274</link>
		<dc:creator>merylrunion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 23:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.speakstrong.com/newsletter/2007/05/31/phrases-for-a-conversation-about-conversations/#comment-1274</guid>
		<description>Susan,
I know what you mean! It's so easy to get sucked into what is being said and forget to stand back and look at the conversation itself. My technique is to review what I "should have said" after the fact, not to beat myself up, but to be more prepared the next time.

Nik,
I know what you mean too! I tell those who say the media is liberal that's it sounds to me like they don't listen to liberal media much if they think the mainstream is liberal. 

That said, there are plenty of people on liberal media who use the same attack tactics that I find so abhorrent. There are some who will create theories without much substantiation. 

And there are others whom I find quite credible. Here's how I've established that. What they say passes the test of time. I'm happy to share my sources with you if you are interested.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Susan,<br />
I know what you mean! It&#8217;s so easy to get sucked into what is being said and forget to stand back and look at the conversation itself. My technique is to review what I &#8220;should have said&#8221; after the fact, not to beat myself up, but to be more prepared the next time.</p>
<p>Nik,<br />
I know what you mean too! I tell those who say the media is liberal that&#8217;s it sounds to me like they don&#8217;t listen to liberal media much if they think the mainstream is liberal. </p>
<p>That said, there are plenty of people on liberal media who use the same attack tactics that I find so abhorrent. There are some who will create theories without much substantiation. </p>
<p>And there are others whom I find quite credible. Here&#8217;s how I&#8217;ve established that. What they say passes the test of time. I&#8217;m happy to share my sources with you if you are interested.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nik Nikkel</title>
		<link>http://www.speakstrong.com/newsletter/2007/05/31/phrases-for-a-conversation-about-conversations/#comment-1273</link>
		<dc:creator>Nik Nikkel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 20:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.speakstrong.com/newsletter/2007/05/31/phrases-for-a-conversation-about-conversations/#comment-1273</guid>
		<description>I think the lack of a rational national conversation is deadly.  It certainly plays into the hands of those who far beyond being merely dishonest, truly wish to rule this country by division and confusion.
Dishonest and cowardly people never want to be accountablefor anything.  They are the ones who have "spin doctors", need "handlers" for public officials and dwell in a la-la land where "mistakes were made".  
With a "liberal" media that is almost entirely owned by "conservatives" and serves primarily as a white house propaganda arm, there is no where to turn for reliably honest coverage of anything.
The only hope, really, is a grass roots honesty that begins by having one honest conversation with facts and other old fashioned things, including courtesy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the lack of a rational national conversation is deadly.  It certainly plays into the hands of those who far beyond being merely dishonest, truly wish to rule this country by division and confusion.<br />
Dishonest and cowardly people never want to be accountablefor anything.  They are the ones who have &#8220;spin doctors&#8221;, need &#8220;handlers&#8221; for public officials and dwell in a la-la land where &#8220;mistakes were made&#8221;.<br />
With a &#8220;liberal&#8221; media that is almost entirely owned by &#8220;conservatives&#8221; and serves primarily as a white house propaganda arm, there is no where to turn for reliably honest coverage of anything.<br />
The only hope, really, is a grass roots honesty that begins by having one honest conversation with facts and other old fashioned things, including courtesy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan</title>
		<link>http://www.speakstrong.com/newsletter/2007/05/31/phrases-for-a-conversation-about-conversations/#comment-1271</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 20:28:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.speakstrong.com/newsletter/2007/05/31/phrases-for-a-conversation-about-conversations/#comment-1271</guid>
		<description>Wow...those are so good...I just hope I can remember to use them the next time I really need them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow&#8230;those are so good&#8230;I just hope I can remember to use them the next time I really need them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
