November 25, 2009Poison Phrase tip: Your “walking wounded” dictionary

Filed under: Poison Phrase of the Week by merylrunion |

Yesterday my husband sat near me to tell me all about an insight he was pondering. He was still talking while he got up and started walking away. What does that say? Well, it seems to be a clear indication that he had no interest in any kind of a response. His departure seemed perfectly timed for him to have a complete say, and for me not to have a voice.

When my “stuff is up,” I experience this as a horrific dismissal. When my stuff isn’t up, I experience it as one normal way to behave, and I figure that if I do want a two-way conversation, it’s up to me to make my desire known.

When I’m emotionally triggered, addressing the dynamic is difficult because I experience a wound and reexperience many old wounds related to feeling talked at and dismissed. He senses all of that when I talk about it and is more likely to react with defensiveness. But when my stuff isn’t up, it’s a simple situation of me making my wishes known. And he responds without reacting.

That’s why I recommend that you make a list of words that trigger a bigger than life reaction in you. Then you can take responsibility for your own reactions.

Black and white language is a huge trigger for me… I find myself feeling jammed into a teeny tiny box. But when I recognize that my ire is activated because of a kind of languaging that creates a reaction in me, it’s easier for me to respond to the situation from graceful power rather than old hurts.

- Always and

- never are high on my walking wounded list.

What words are on yours?

Share
View/add to comments (3) | Email This Post Email This Post

Related posts which may interest you

    • Poison Phrase: It hurt my ego. Don’t confuse your heart with your ego!
    • Dumping and Preaching are not Speaking Strong
    • This Week in the World ~ Big stories, myths, and accumulating power
    • Ask Meryl ~ Who asked you?
    • Reader Discussion ~ How do you know if you’re having an egoic reaction?

3 Comments »

  1. I agree with your comments on black and white language, especially. I work with several individuals who seem to want the universe to fit into neat, orderly, static definitions. To them, something, or someone, is either good or evil, there is no middle ground. Of course they don’t truly think that way 100% of the time, but they use language that implies such so often that it’s hard to tell…

    Comment by Ken Rhodes — December 3, 2009 @ 1:13 pm

  2. I could barely pay attention to your observation about yourself because I’m still hung up on the picture of a man who wants to share something he is pondering with his wife. In my experience, this is not typical. Pondering? Sharing? I think I am envious! I know how this sounds, but I can only speak from my own experience, so don’t get mad anybody!

    As for the exchange itself, it seems normal to me to want to express something out loud without it meaning I am soliciting a response from someone else. It might be a complex idea that I’ve not been able to work my way through solely in my head; or just a momentary whine about something I don’t expect anyone to resolve or address in any way. Not all speaking out loud is a conversation, nor does it need to be. I think you’re right about it being our own responsibility to make our desire known to the other person. Not that a little sensitivity wouldn’t be welcome, but humans being what they are …..

    My trigger? It’s an ideology that works its way into language. My way or the highway. Love it or leave it. If you can’t take the heat…. After I hear some variation of that way of thinking in someone’s conversation, it’s pretty hard for me to keep listening or take the speaker seriously. I know I am being dismissed if I am not in the speaker’s “camp”.

    Comment by Kathleen — December 26, 2009 @ 3:08 pm

  3. I laughed at your obstacle about the unreality of a man wanting to share an idea. I guess one way communication is better than no way communication! We have been moving our way toward actual dialog in the 13 years of our marriage. We’re getting there, bit by bit.

    Now that I’m more conscious of the walk-away dynamic, I don’t take it personally, nor do I assume it needs to be the end of the conversation.

    Yes, your examples get me too. Ideology is another kind of one-sided conversation. Black and white, either or. I used to feel trapped in those boxes… but now I can stay out of them in my own mind at least.

    Thanks for your comment!

    Comment by merylrunion — December 28, 2009 @ 2:13 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post. | TrackBack URI
You can also bookmark this on del.icio.us or check the cosmos

Leave a comment




XHTML ( You can use these tags): <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> .

« Success Story: Conversation about hygiene changes a life    SpeakStrong gift ideas: Gift ideas: NIA dance, SpeakStrong, and PowerPhrases! »

Newsletter Sign Up

Name
Email
Follow Meryl on Twitter image link

RSS Feed

Keep current with SpeakStrong Posts using Google RSS Reader



Categories

  • Admin Assistants
  • Announcements and events
  • Ashley
  • Ask Meryl
  • B2B associate courtships
  • Book Reviews
  • Character-based Communication
  • Discussion Topic
  • Dynamic dignity/corporate ignominy
  • Expectation Management
  • How to restore sanity
  • Hubby series
  • Kids
  • Kudo Corner
  • Leadership
  • New Dynamics
  • Newsletter
  • Nurses
  • Poison Phrase of the Week
  • Power Phrase Quick Tip
  • Quote
  • Reader comment
  • Reader Stories
  • Speak Strong, smart and sweet
  • Success Story
  • Success story in progress
  • The PowerPhrase of the Week
  • The SpeakStrong Method
  • This Week in the World
  • Tip of the week
  • Uncategorized
Powered by WordPress
Theme by Sreejith, Customized by MyBlogCoach
Copyright © 2012 A PowerPhrase a Week