September 29, 2010What should be a PowerPhrase is a Poison Phrase in a bumper-sticker world
John Kerry had the facts on his side when he said that the electorate
- Doesn’t always pay that much attention to what’s going on so people are influenced by a simple slogan.
Can anyone sincerely argue with the facts of the statement?
In our bumper-sticker slogan world, people argue with the statement WITHOUT considering the facts of it.
And the fact that pundits turned Kerry’s remark into a Poison Phrase proved Kerry’s point. Because people aren’t paying close attention, they are influenced by simple slogans saying that to suggest we’re not paying attention is an insult.
Of course, a true PowerPhrase talks about what you want rather than what you don’t want. So a better choice of words might have been,
- We need to pay enough attention so simple slogans don’t sway us. And we need to face the reality of our culture and make it simpler and easier to pay attention to what’s going on.
If you can’t beat the power of simple slogans, join ‘em. With slogans that are simple and accurate.
I loved the title of my first political book, Unite and Concur. But my title for my next book on political communication, How to Restore Sanity to Our Political Conversations is simpler. Quicker. And simple clarity is one thing that will help restore sanity in all our conversations.
September 27, 2010When the going gets tough, talking like a victim doesn’t help.
Systems break down, times change, and what worked before stops working. It’s a dynamic world out there. Many are ready to break under the pressure of organisations that once seemed to care and no longer do. Some are crashing and burning. Others, however, are flourishing even now.
When the going gets tough, talking like a victim doesn’t help.
“Ain’t-it-awfulling” doesn’t change anything.
And while I’ll be the first to say it’s important to honor what you feel about a change, mistreatment or dismissiveness, ultimately it’s up to us to move from victim language to empowered communication. The phrase “deal with it” is a Poison Phrase without compassion. It’s a PowerPhrase when coupled with compassion.
I talk to people who once had productive, collaborative and caring work environments, and now are overloaded or cast aside because of buy-outs or other changes that removed all sense of loyalty or humanity from their operation. I’ve been there myself. And
- What are you going to do about it
…is a Poison Phrase if spoken too soon, and a PowerPhrase in proper timing.
Last month I was moved by a post in Salon.com called: The Hot Young Teacher they Hired Instead. Here’s the subtext. I have decades of experience in the classroom, but when I went up against Alex for a job, I knew how it would end.
It was a heartfelt, beautifully written article that evoked lots of empathy in me. But in my reading, I felt something was missing. The author said upfront that she knew she would not get the job. Yet her actions did not reflect someone who was pretty sure she’d be looking for work the next school year.
For starter, anyone who writes as well as this author does surely could create some kind of back-up plan for herself.
Yes, grieve losses. Figure out who done wrong and how. But don’t wallow. Because when the going gets tough, talking like a victim doesn’t help.
My forthcoming Dynamic Leadership book has a chapter on the language of leadership. I think it’s the best chapter in the book, and I love every chapter. It reminds me to keep moving forward as well. Every day is a new dynamic for each of us. What are we going to do about it?
September 24, 2010Poison Phrase: She’s overreacting
Shirley’s graphic designer Joyce was robbed a couple of months back, and it left her shaken. As a result, she hasn’t been able to get to Shirley’s project. Joyce commented,
- They didn’t even take that much. I think she’s overreacting.
While Joyce’s reaction might make her unavailable to work on Shirley’s project, it’s hard to say what an appropriate reaction to anything is. I know I sometimes handle things with amazing calm and other times am shaken more than I might have expected. Certainly we need to make decisions based on whether or not people can be available, but we don’t need to put ourselves up as judges of how long one should grieve. Some people expect others to get over the loss of a spouse overnight, or the loss of a job in a few days. The reality is, it takes as long as it takes.
September 24, 2010A legitimate question that was only a Poison Phrase because of how it was asked
Marion spoke with Jason about his services for about a half hour, and determined that after numerous dead-ends with other service providers, he would be the one to help her. She was dismayed to learn that it would be six weeks before he could see her for her first appointment.
- What am I supposed to do in the meantime?
She asked accusingly. Her tone implied that she held Jason responsible for her situation when they hadn’t ever met.
But when Jason considered her question, he realized there was some legitimacy in it, even if the hostility was unwarrented. It was a long time for her to wait to even start a process, and he needed to have an answer for Marion and other new clients about what they should do in the meantime. Jason is a healthcare consultant, so for him, the questions are about how to address health issues. And since so many of his clients don’t drink enough, exercise enough etc., there are things he can suggest people do in the meantime, even when he hasn’t seen them yet.
The real point of this post is, even when a question is hurled as an unfair attack, it could have legitimacy. Separate the hostility from the need that underlies it and see if there is a way to respond.
September 23, 2010Reader Question: Because I told you so
Meryl, I was just reading the part of your SpeakStrong book where you ask the reader “How many of us heard, ‘Because I said so!’ as a child?” That made me start thinking deep thoughts about how serious of a Poison Phrase that is.
Obviously it depends on the situation. In general, pronouncements carry a lot more weight if the speaker is willing to back it up with sound logic. But as a parent, I often find myself resorting to “Because I said so!”, not because I am refusing to share my reasoning, but because kids will often keep up the resistance, and the questioning, long after you’ve given what should be an adequate explanation. For example…
“Can we go to the baseball card store now?”
“No, not today.”
“But why?”
“You had band after school. We took your brother to soccer and we have to get him in an hour. Now you need to get some homework done before you have scouts tonight.”
“But I can do homework later. And you said we have an hour. That’s plenty of time to go to the baseball card store.”
“No. It’s 20 minutes each way, so you wouldn’t have much time there. And I don’t want to spend all afternoon running around anyway.”
“But I haven’t been in two weeks! And there’s no traffic this time of day. It would probably only take 15 minutes each way.”
“No. I want to spend some time at home. And I need to start dinner.”
Etc, etc, etc… Brent, in particular, can keep throwing out arguments until the cows come home. And it seems like a big waste of time to keep dishing out answers to his questions.
So I wonder… Could it be that “Because I said so!” would be a Poison Phrase if used at the beginning of a conversation because it would be used for evasive purposes, but it wouldn’t be a Poison Phrase if used after it became clear that the kid wasn’t receptive to your answers anyway? In fact, then it might even constitute a Power Phrase. It’s like a more polite way of saying “Shut up!”
Meryl responds:
While I agree it’s very different and far more poisonous when used as avoidance and to shut down any discussion, than after you’ve given reasons that they’re arguing with, I still think there are better, more honest ways to respond at that point too. “Because I said so” could be replaced with
- Because I don’t want to
which you said twice in this example.
There’s a difference between someone trying to collaborate with you to make it work for you to give them what they want, and someone trying to wear down your resistance. As soon as you get the sense that’s what’s happening, I’d address it. . I suggest you tap into the say what you mean and mean what you say without being mean when you say it, remembering think, feel and want. For example,
- I think you’re trying to wear me down. That feels very unpleasant to me. I want you to accept my decision.
Not only is it more honest, but it models better communication than a blanket dismissal.
September 22, 2010PowerPhrase: The ultimate communication formula, and the empowerment sentence stems
Jenny Finn is a movement educator who grounds people and brings them into their power by directing them to pay attention to their feet and their breath. Try it. It’s pretty effective. She also talks about how much power we lose when we try to get other people to be responsible for our happiness. Wise words indeed.
As I frolicked around her dance floor last night feeling enlivened and energized, it occurred to me that when I coach, I do something similar to her refocus. We talk for a while, and then sum up the conversation by remembering the formula, say what you mean, mean what you say, and don’t be mean when you say it. Then I’ll ask,
- What do you think?
- What do you feel?
- What do you want?
There’s a lot more to a productive conversation than you knowing what you think, feel and want, but it is a great place to start. Even saying,
- I don’t know what I want yet…
is better than ignoring the question.
Jenn Finn provides empowerment through grounding in her way. I provide it in my own way. Put them together, and I’d say you’ll be Speaking Strong. (Which, by the way, is a great book for you to learn more about how to find your authentic power.)
September 22, 2010PoisonPhrase that plays to perfectionism: I’m glad you like it. It has this flaw…
Have you seen my video of Bunny Bubbles from The Center for Lowered Expectations?
“Bunny” points out a spot on her jacket for no good reason. Many of us do that far too often.
Saturday I admired a pottery piece an acquaintance brought flowers in to an event I attended. She immediately pointed out:
- Look. The handle broke when I made it, and I glued it back on.
While there are times to note flaws, too many of us let them overshadow the beauty of our work. Things don’t have to be perfect for us to be proud of them. I shared what I liked about the piece and with that focus, she noted what she liked too.
There’s no need to hype the flaws. Of course if I was considering purchasing the item I would have wanted to know about it, but the only people who expect perfection are perfectionists, and I gave up trying to meet their standards ages ago. I invite you to as well.
September 22, 2010Success Story: How to request people use your complete name.
What’s in a name? Well, respect for one thing. My name is often mispronounced and while I forgive people who struggle with it, I always appreciate the effort. Some people have dismissed my reminders by suggesting it’s an accent issue, or some such thing. Even if it’s an accent, if it doesn’t sound like my name to me, I would hope people would care enough to learn how I like being called and make the effort to get it closer.
Not that I’m an innocent in this matter. Ironically, when I started to write this post, I thought about a friend from years back named Pamela. I kept forgetting and calling her Pam, which she didn’t like. Thinking about her led me to search for her on the internet just now. I entered a search for… Pam instead of Pamela. Yikes! Old habits die hard!
But this is a success story about someone who graciously reminded me in an email about how she likes people to refer to her. She’s my editor at McGraw Hill for my next project. Her name is MaryTherese. When I referred to her as Mary in my email, she replied,
- I know it’s a mouthful, but I do go by my full name which is MaryTherese.
Message received, pleasantly.
September 22, 2010Powered by integrity and authenticity: Some execs prefer the second tier
A friend is interviewing women leaders in an international organization in preparation for a leadership conference. One of her questions asks whether these women want to move into the top leadership level. My friend finds most of the women she interviews don’t, because leadership at the top is fiercely competitive and manipulative. They’d rather lead a level down where they can be more collaborative and authentic.
Many people would insist that this is all the more reason why these women should get into the higher leadership levels – to transform the culture. And while that might be true, it’s really useful for us to know ourselves and where we can best flourish and be effective. It isn’t always at the top.
Research is showing that as there are more women than men in the workplace and as women step into more leadership positions, collaborative leadership styles become more prevalent. The change is happening. And if you’re into power – well – you can influence from anywhere if you’re powered by integrity and authenticity. It takes wisdom to bypass the kind of power most people think you should want in exchange for a kind of influence that suits your nature. And it takes courage to take the next step to create cultural change if it’s needed and you’re ready.
My friend and colleague’s study is helping to pave the way by getting the concerns out into the open. The interviews also reveal that top leadership doesn’t know there’s a problem. They won’t be able to pretend any more after the conference.
September 18, 2010PowerPhrase: Let’s take one step at a time.
I know myself well enough to realize that I need to reign myself in at times. Sometimes people I work with do that for me. Today a web marketer I work with said,
- Let’s take one step at a time.
What makes his words so powerful to me is that he has a process with a track record, so I don’t hear his words as a dismissal – just as prioritizing.
And taking one step at a time is not only more productive, it feels much more sane and balanced.
